Stewart and Pahl + Rowsell

While some parts of the readings this week were a little confusing, there were a bunch of aspects of them that I really enjoyed, and can absolutely see myself using in my own classroom.

From the "Conceptualizing Artifactual Literacies" chapter, I love the concept of connecting culture and personal touches to literacy. It says that objects/artifacts:
- have physical features that make it distinct, such as color or texture
- is created, carried, found, put on display, hidden, or worn
- embodies people, stories, thoughts, communities, identities, and experiences
- is valued or made by a meaning maker in a particular content

One thing I think of when I read this list is finding a way to make a project (both presentation wise and writing wise) where my students can connect their own "artifacts" to our readings. By this, I mean finding an opportunity in the curriculum where they can bring in something that represents who they are, what they believe, or what is meaningful to them. When reading a story or book on culture, they can bring in something that reprints what makes them them. For me, I could bring in my menorah, since it's such a big part of the Jewish tradition. I could also bring in my ancestry list that tracks back to the Mayflower. These things make me me, and would be easy to present, and write a paper about. Connecting, sharing, and representing.

"Artifacts bring in everyday life. They are material and they represent culture." I love this quote, and strongly agree with it. Using artifacts in the classroom for literature is a great way to keep it relevant, and relatable. It's like Christensen said, if we help make the lessons more relatable, it will help students connect and understand what we're teaching.

"Artifactual literacy acknowledges that everyone has a story to tell and that they bring story into their learning." I don't think I need to say anything about this quote. I love it, I believe it, and this is part of what makes connecting the students to the lesson so important and special.

In the Stewart reading, I loved the REAL instruction part. Relevant, Engaging, Affirmative, and Literacy oriented. Like Christensen and the other reading this week, the value of using relevant and relatable connections to literature and learning makes it so much easier and better for the learners.

Comments

  1. Lila,

    I wonder which part that is little confusing to you. I was pretty overwhelmed with the information and I didn't think about feeling confused until I read your blog. I wonder if I really feel confused, too. Yes, I believe I truly did. However, I wonder which part are you confused about. I am confused about how to apply these information with Deaf students who didn't have first language foundation and didn't understand their own culture, as well. How can I teach them what they missed? That's the confusing part for me.

    Artifact activity gives me a biggest relief and like Maddy said a sense of calmness. I can see that all of us in this class enjoy Pahl and Roswell's article because it is FUN and CREATIVE.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ELL Writers (Fu and Martinez)

Sharing and Responding: Elbow and Belanoff

Introduction to 445: Cameron, NCTE, and Hawley Turner and Hicks